Category Archives: Washington Times Communities

Senior Valentines are happier and more optimistic

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

If all the advertising full of hearts and flowers hasn’t given it away already, Tuesday is Valentine’s Day. More than ever, many of the couples celebrating their love this year will have met through online dating. Of the online matches who meet in person, one-third turn into relationships. One in five married couples married last year met online. By 2019, it is estimated that more than half of all couples will have found their start through online dating.

Online dating isn’t just for the young. Over the last year, the number of dating-site users 50 years of age or older has grown twice as rapidly as any other age group, according to comScore. The online dating website OurTime.com, the largest dating site for adults 50 and up, says it has one million members, a growth rate of 400 percent in just two years. It calls the growth “astonishing.”

OurTime.com surveyed its membership and found that 93 percent agree that having a romantic relationship is an important component of their overall happiness.

Survey results show romance is alive and well among the Baby Boomer generation:

  • 89 percent are at a point in their lives where they feel fulfilled and are looking for someone to share their lives with.
  • 95 percent are more focused on compatibility, and finding someone who makes them happy, than they were when they were younger.
  • 89 percent say they have a better idea of the type of person who will make them happy.
  • 80 percent have children over the age of 25; 81 percent do not have children who live at home.

The desire for a meaningful relationship doesn't diminish with age.

The OurTime.com survey also found that when compared to their younger years, adults have changed their views in the following ways:

  • 85 percent agree that companionship is more important now.
  • 79 percent are more confident in what they want out of life.
  • 87 percent are more confident in their intelligence.
  • 82 percent are more confident when meeting new people.
  • 91 percent are more confident as a judge of character.
  • 52 percent are less focused on “getting ahead” in their career; another 29 percent said the career question was not applicable to them.

The best news of all for young and old alike: the OurTime.com poll found 82% of the people surveyed are happier and more optimistic than when they were younger.

Older and wiser may also mean older and more romantic.

Dr. Gail Saltz of OurTime.com says “The main reason people 50-plus are happier now is that they are more confident in themselves and about what they want from life.

“Priorities shift in this stage of life and relationships become more and more important to one’s happiness.”

Today, someone turns 50 every seven-seconds, making the 50-plus demographic the fastest growing demographic in the country, the company says. The 78 million Baby Boomers now represent 28 percent of the U.S. population. According to 2010 U.S. Census data, almost 30 percent of Boomers are single.

“As these surveys illustrate, most people in this stage of life are no longer so stressed about getting ahead in their careers, and their kids are already out of the house,” said Dr. Saltz. “This allows them to focus on companionship and sharing this fulfilling time with someone they love.”

We are sweet on our LifeCycles readers. To each of you, Happy Valentine’s Day!

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com”when quoting from or linking to this story.
Copyright © 2012 by At Your Home Familycare

Super Bowl XLVI TV commercials ignored Baby Boomers

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

Super Bowl XLVI TV commercials ignored Baby Boomers

Photo: American Honda

Whether you’re a football fan or not, you’re probably talking about the commercials from this weekend’s Super Bowl: Clint Eastwood, David Beckham and Adriana Lima, talking babies, plenty of clever dogs and lots of auto ads.

Most automakers including Chevy forgot about the many buyers over 50 watching Super Bowl XLVI.

But if you’re over 50, you probably noticed most of the advertisers didn’t bother to talk to you. This is a big, big mistake. Baby Boomers born between 1946 and 1964 represent 26.3 percent of the country’s total population but control a third of all consumer spending – more than $2.1 trillion in annual buying power according to the MetLife Mature Market Institute. That’s more than sixteen times Generation X (born 1965-1976, $125 billion in buying power) and Generation Y (1977 – present, $172 billion buying power).

Only two of the top 15 favorite brands of Baby Boomers identified by Ad Age magazine bought advertising on the Super Bowl: Volkswagen and Pepsi. The list in order:

  1. Levi’s
  2. Harley-Davidson
  3. Volkswagen
  4. Slinky
  5. Noxzema
  6. The Beatles
  7. L’Eggs
  8. Pepsi
  9. Absolut Vodka
  10. Saturday Night Live
  11. Facebook
  12. Frye Boots
  13. Coach Bags
  14. Clairol
  15. Club Med

The Vibrant Woman website surveyed its audience of women over 50 about their favorite brands. None of them showed up either: Polo/Ralph Lauren, Martha Stewart, Jack Daniels, Subaru, Starbucks, and Merrill shoes.

Other brands known for targeting baby boomers with successful marketing include BMW/Mini and Starwood Hotels. They were missing in action too.

Just one ad was clearly designed to appeal to Baby Boomers. It came from Honda with its send-up of the movie “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” featuring the mature in age but not in attitude Matthew Broderick. Most critics applauded it as fun, creative, and clever, among the most successful ads of this year’s game.

One ad that was a smashing success with Baby Boomers and viewers of all ages: Betty White for Snickers in 2010.

We have to go back two years to Super Bowl 44 in 2010 to find a commercial that successfully appealed to adults over 50, and it was by far the most successful Super Bowl commercial that year and named the most successful commercial for all of 2010. It’s possibly one of the few you can remember: the Snickers commercial featuring Betty White and Abe Vigoda playing touch football. The commercial turned out to be a springboard for the then 88-year-old White, who has since become one of the most popular and well-known celebrities in the United States and who is still going strong at age 90.

The group that really missed out: technology companies. USA Today reported in 2011 that Baby Boomers spend more on technology than young buyers, according to data from Forrester Research. It’s true that younger buyers are eager technology shoppers but they don’t have the buying power of the Baby Boomers. For example, Baby Boomers are buying more Apple products. They cite their ease of use, speed, dependability, and style. Imagine that!

It’s true that people of all ages get a kick out of funny animals, babies, and wild stunts, but imagine the payoff if a company actually figured out that people over 50 are watching, are paying attention, and have money ready to spend. It seems like a winning formula to me.

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

VIDEO: Watch all the Super Bowl XLVI ads here.

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com”when quoting from or linking to this story.
Copyright © 2012 by At Your Home Familycare

Anthropologist Margaret Mead addresses today’s aging issues

Photo: Margaret Mead

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

“If you associate enough with older people who enjoy their lives who are not stored away in any golden ghetto, you will gain a sense of continuity and of the possibility for a full life.” Margaret Mead

Margaret Mead may be the only anthropologist most of us can name. Although she died over 30 years ago in 1978, her writings and insights on modern American and Western culture remain of interest.

Margaret Mead would have much to say about today's older generation.

Mead had strong views about what it means to age in modern society. In an interview with U.S. News and World Report in May 1963 about the state of the American family, Mead predicted the circumstances we now face in 2012. She is amazingly prescient about the challenges faced by the Baby Boomer generation and their families. Her thoughts are well worth revisiting.

In her interview, Mead was asked whether grandparents could contribute more to the stresses and strains upon parents in a modern family.

Mead:  Well, grandparents don’t live in the home to any great degree any more. Even when they do, people feel they shouldn’t be there. The grandparents feel they shouldn’t be there. The parents feel they shouldn’t be there. The children are taught they shouldn’t be there.

Q.  Isn’t this a change? What’s caused it?

Mead: It’s partly because of the size of the house, of people living in city apartments with no room for grandparents. Also, improved Social Security benefits mean that some grandparents can afford to live alone better.

And another thing: Twenty or so years ago young people married when they were older. Often they married people their parents had never met. Often the two sets of parents didn’t like each other and so the safest thing to do was to move away from both sets of parents, so you didn’t get involved in their disapproval. Besides, grandparents were supposed to be old-fashioned.

In the last 15 years grandparents have become popular again—but always provided they don’t live in the house.

Q. Why the regained popularity, then?

Mead: Children are marrying so young, they’re going steady so early, that the two sets of parents are almost bound to know each other, almost forced to like—or at least accept—each other. Often they are forced to combine to support their married children, and the grandchildren that come along.

Also we have that wonderful invention, the sitter. That’s a wonderful thing to do with your mother-in-law. You see, when she comes in, you can go out.

Margaret Mead remains America's most well-known anthropologist with much wisdom to share even though she died decades ago.

Q. Doesn’t this mean we might get back to the three-generation family—children, parents and grandparents living under the same roof?

Mead: No. There is, I think, a continuing trend away from it, especially in these “ghettos” that are being built for older people.

Q. “Ghettos”?

Mead: They are special preserves where only older people may live. In some, no one under 50 is allowed—like a maternity ward in reverse. As someone said of these places recently, “They’re programmed for death.” Instead of having the older people near the growing children and being part of the community, they’re putting them away in these boxes.

Q. Could grandparents really contribute to a family?

Mead: I think older people know much more about change than young people. What children have to learn is how to live in a changing world.

These children that are born now think the world was made the way it is today—complete with transistors. They need someone who gives them some kind of perspective—someone who can convince them that you could be born in one world, grow up in another, and grow old in a third.

Q. And could grandparents do that for them?

Mead: Grandparents could give them an idea it’s possible.

Q. Living apart as most of them do, what could these grandmothers do in the life of the family?

Mead: I think we could have GTAs—Grandmother-Teacher Associations. Grandmothers should be still tied into the school, should be going to the school, helping the school, conferring with the teachers about Jimmy’s spelling and Suzy’s arithmetic. They should be doing a lot of the chauffeuring. They have the time—much more time than young mothers.

Furthermore, that way we would not be turning grandmothers into cranky, disgruntled taxpayers. Now we graduate mothers from the PTA the day their last child leaves school.

We say, “You don’t belong any more.” And so they get cut off from the whole school life of the community. Instead of being an asset, they’re often just a group of rather unhappy critics.

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com”when quoting from or linking to this story.
Copyright © 2012 by At Your Home Familycare

Ten foods that pack a positive and tasty nutritional punch

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

Are you still sticking with your New Year’s resolution? You have almost made it through the first month. Congratulations! Scientific studies show that it takes 21 days to form a new habit. If you got started on New Year’s Day, you should have some healthy new habits in place.  This is something to be proud of.

If you did not make a New Year’s resolution about your health or diet, you can still make good choices to improve your eating habits by choosing more of the foods loaded with healthful nutrients including anti-oxidants, fiber, and protein, with less fats, sugars, and sodium.

So many healthy food lists seem unrealistic to me. They have exotic grains and fruits and vegetables that are not on the shelves at the average American supermarket. Who has time to go to a half-dozen stores for exotic specialty products?

In some cases, healthy foods seem more like prescriptions, not pleasurable eating experiences. No one would stick with them as part of their diet except for the most extreme and disciplined person which is also unrealistic.

This is a list of ten foods you should have no trouble finding which are also delicious and easy to prepare that appear on the lists from numerous nutrition experts.

The Ten Best

Greek yogurt is loaded with calcium and protein. Choose a low or nonfat version. Add berries and sprinkle with chopped nuts.

Greek yogurt is loaded with calcium and protein. Choose a low or nonfat version. Add berries and sprinkle with chopped nuts.

Salmon may be prepared in many different ways. It is rich in valuable omega-3s and antioxidants.

Salmon may be prepared in many different ways. It is rich in valuable omega-3s and antioxidants.

Broccoli is packed with valuable nutrients and delicious when you learn how to prepare it without overcooking.

Broccoli is packed with valuable nutrients and delicious when you learn how to prepare it without overcooking.

Green tea has numerous benefits and can be sipped hot or cold.

Green tea has numerous benefits and can be sipped hot or cold.

  1. Berries – Blueberries, strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, they are all packed with anti-oxidents and provide that bit of sweetness we love without processed sugar. Frozen berries lose a minimum of nutritional punch so there is no excuse not to eat them year-round.
  2. Yogurt – This is not the sweetened, frozen kind, or the fruit on the bottom type loaded up with sugar. Choose unsweetened, low (2%) or non-fat yogurt. If you have not tried Greek style yogurt, you may be pleasantly surprised. Add a touch of cinnamon, honey and nuts.
  3. Sweet potatoes –  Packed with Vitamins A, C, and loaded with fiber if you eat the skin. Eat them in soup, salad, casseroles, or pureed. If you need a little indulgence, cut them into fries, dust with seasonings and a light touch of olive oil and bake them for healthy but indulgent fries. Avoid Grandma’s version loaded with syrup, brown sugar and marshmallows.
  4. Salmon – Salmon is rich in cancer-fighting omega-3 fatty acids, which also prevent heart disease and have been linked to a reduced risk of depression. A serving also contains niacin, which is thought to protect you against Alzheimer’s disease and memory loss. Go for wild salmon to maximize the benefits.
  5. Garbanzo Beans – These beans are packed with iron, trace minerals, protein and fiber. You can hardly do better! One serving has more than 30% of the protein and almost 50% of the fiber you need daily. Add a good fat such as olive oil to help fully digest the protein. Hummus on vegetables or crispbread is a great choice that feels indulgent.
  6. Broccoli – Jam packed with cancer fighting agents, vitamin C, and fiber. Microwave it in a covered bowl with a little water, and drizzle with lemon or flavored vinegar.
  7. Nuts – Full of omega-3s, almost as much as salmon, plus antioxidants. Walnuts, almonds, and Brazil nuts are good choices. Avoid overly salted nuts, and watch out for overdoing it as you can end up eating a lot of calories. Use them on top of other dishes as a garnish or eat a handful as a snack.
  8. Green tea –  Researchers keep learning more about green tea’s potential to fight cancer and heart disease, lower cholesterol, burn fat, prevent diabetes and strokes and protect against dementia. Green tea drinkers have lower blood pressure. Drinking green tea instead of sugary drinks or coffee loaded with cream can aid weight loss. Drink it hot or cold, and as much as you like.
  9. Barley – Barley is a low-glycemic grain (meaning it does not spike blood sugar). It is high in both soluble and insoluble fiber, which lowers cholesterol and reduces the risk of colon cancer. It helps the body metabolize fats and other carbohydrates. It is also tasty and readily available. Use it as a delicious breakfast cereal, in soups and stews and as a rice substitute.
  10. Spinach – Popeye was right. Spinach is one of the most nutrient-dense foods that exists, packed with antioxidants, fiber, calcium, protein, folate and iron – and a cup is only 40 calories!  It helps prevent cancer, improves brain function and memory, strengths your cardiovascular system, and protects you against aging. Talk about motivating! Add it to smoothies, soups, put it on sandwiches, sneak it in wherever you can.  

It is unrealistic to expect anyone to radically change their diet by eating all ten of these foods at once. Consider trying to add servings of two per week while continuing to cut back on unhealthy foods in your diet.

Look up appealing recipes in publications such as Prevention Magazine. You may find some new favorites and you can feel great about your positive health changes!

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com”when quoting from or linking to this story.
Copyright © 2012 by At Your Home Familycare

Our nation’s veterans not immune from elder abuse

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

Photo: Courtesy PearlsOfHonor.blogspot.com

Of the 60,000 military personnel present for the attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on December 7, 1941, about 3,000 are still alive. Seventy-four of them belong to the San Diego Chapter of the Pearl Harbor Survivors Association. Their numbers are rapidly declining and the vast majority of them are in their late 80s or 90s. They are a national treasure, a link to an important place and time in American history.

When they are gone, this living link will die with them. During their days on earth, they should be afforded the utmost respect and gratitude this nation has to offer.

Max Bauer (center) holding the banner of the San Diego Chapter of the Pearl Harbor Survivors Association on July 4, 2005. Courtesy PearlsOfHonor.blogspot.com

In many ways, 93-year-old Arnold V. “Max” Bauer considered himself a typical but proud Pearl Harbor survivor. He had a special Pearl Harbor survivor’s license plate on his car. He appeared in a documentary about the attack in 2009.  Now he is in the news again, but for all the wrong reasons. After his wife of 62 years died in 2007, he grew frail and a caregiver, 63-year-old Milagros Angeles, moved into his suburban San Diego County home.

Several months ago, Angeles was arrested when sheriff’s deputies discovered she and Bauer were living in unimaginable squalor. Alert employees at Bauer’s Chase Bank branch became suspicious about the absence of activity on his account and reported it to authorities. Angeles has been charged with elder abuse, false imprisonment, theft by a caretaker and being in possession of altered checks. Authorities found $9,000 in cash in her bedroom. Prosecutors said Angeles had written 56 checks to herself totaling $5,600. She had pled not guilty.

While she awaited trial, in November 2011 Max Bauer died of pneumonia after several months in a veterans rest home. Authorities suspect his illness was as a direct result of the neglect by his caregiver. Now the San Diego District Attorney’s office is investigating to determine whether Angeles should be charged with the murder of Max Bauer.

It is a bold move, and I applaud the Elder Abuse Unit for considering it. This episode is so painful to me on several levels. First, that one of our nation’s most venerable and noble citizens should ever be subjected to this kind of treatment.

But even more so, as the president and founder of a private duty home care agency for 28 years, without a doubt that this should not have happened. Not if whoever hired Angeles as Bauer’s caretaker had been diligent in doing his or her homework and hiring a caregiver from a reputable, accredited agency that does background checks on all its employees and maintains independent supervision of them. See this helpful checklist with the type of questions a person should ask before hiring a caregiver.

My great fear is that we are now going to see this happen more often, due to the threatened loss of the Companionship Exemption as recommended by the U.S. Labor Department and supported by President Obama.

Many more families will resort to hiring people through Craigslist or the like without having the ability to conduct background checks or properly supervise their loved ones’ caregiver, because it will cost them more to hire someone legally and pay them increased wages or overtime pay. They will roll the dice and pay someone under the table.

The good news is this: it is possible with minimal assistance from a professional caregiver provided through a reputable organization for seniors to stay safely in their homes and maintain their autonomy, dignity, and independence. But it must be allowed to remain affordable. The Companionship Exemption has worked perfectly well for decades. There is no reason to change it other than pressure from labor unions who want to organize these home care workers.

Those of us concerned about the welfare of seniors and the disabled and the ability of their families to secure high quality care must speak up and let the Labor Department know that we oppose removal of the Companionship Exemption when the mandatory 60-day comment period begins. See the January 9 LifeCycles column to learn how.

In addition, we must as a society devote more resources to this type of support and we must ensure it is cost-effective. It is the most humane way to care for the men and women who devoted themselves to their family and to their nation. We owe them this much.

We owe our nation's veterans dignity, respect and protection in their later years. Photo Tony Hathcock.

Max Bauer was honored during services commemorating the anniversary of the attack n Pearl Harbor in San Diego this past December 7. Bauer’s cremated ashes will eventually be scattered at the Pearl Harbor National Monument.

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

Visit the Pearls Of Honor website here.

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com”when quoting from or linking to this story.
Copyright © 2012 by At Your Home Familycare

President Obama supports labor law change threatening America’s seniors

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

Photo: Associated Press

A disaster looms on the horizon for the home care industry, its workers, and for the seniors and disabled adults and their families who rely on affordable, quality home care to remain independent. This safety net is being threatened by a Labor Department proposal backed by President Barack Obama as a way to get around stalled jobs legislation in Congress.

As expected, Labor Department officials have officially recommended removing the “companionship exemption” from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  This change, while perhaps well-intentioned on the surface, threatens the quality of home care for many of America’s seniors and disabled adults and will put thousands of people employed in the home care industry out of work.

Currently the FSLA exempts most home care workers (also known as personal care assistants or companion care workers) who provide “companionship services for individuals who because of age or infirmity are unable to care for themselves” from minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. The U.S. Supreme Court recently affirmed this companionship exemption.

Speaking at a White House ceremony in December to announce this action, President Obama was surrounded by a dozen home health care workers. “They deserve to be treated fairly. They deserve to be paid fairly for a service that many older Americans couldn’t live without.”

Make no mistake. Many seniors and their families will be the ones to pay the price, going without home care services when they can no longer afford it as a direct result of this ill-considered proposal.

Seniors could face losing their homes if a proposed labor law change makes quality home care unaffordable. Photo Ginny Austin.

Live-in and sleep-over time is vitally important as a critical safety net. It often provides respite to family caregivers. But it is often no more than being available.  Little or no work is being performed for many of the hours of these shifts.  Overtime is difficult to justify under these circumstances. The cost of overtime especially will make in-home non-medical care unaffordable for many, if not most, of the seniors and persons with disability we serve.

Modifying the exemption will have unintended consequences. In 29 states, including California, an agency will employ a live-in caregiver for a 24-hour shift. If the overtime exemption is eliminated, the agency will staff this case with three workers in eight-hour shifts instead. The workers’ pay will drop and the client will lose continuity of care and the safety it provides with three workers rather than one.

Loss of an affordable in-home non-medical care option will force many seniors and people with disabilities into institutional care, which is often paid for through Medicare, Medicaid or another government program. This puts the burden on taxpayers.  At a time where the nation is taking a hard look at cutbacks in these programs, this is a cost Americans can ill-afford.

People who need private duty services who can no longer afford the professional, caring services offered through private duty companies will simply employ people through the underground economy. They put themselves at risk for substandard care, even elder abuse. Governments will lose tax revenue, while the caregivers will lose important employee protections.

PHI, a national advocacy organization for home care workers, estimates that personal care aides are projected to be the fourth fastest-growing occupation in the U.S. between 2008 and 2018, increasing by 46 percent.  This is no surprise, as we know the U.S. population over 65 is expected to double in the next 20 years.

No one opposes adequate and fair wages of those doing such admirable work. But this need must be carefully balanced with the unique needs of seniors and people with disabilities who need home care and keeping that type of care affordable.

For a patient with dementia who needs 24-hour care, for example, a family is currently allowed to pay home aides at a flat hourly rate. Lindsay points out that if overtime rules apply, the cost of care could triple. How many families could afford a service that triples in price overnight? How many seniors on fixed incomes could even begin to afford it? Many struggle just to pay for food, housing, and medications.

Most home care providers are small business with limited resources.  Eliminating the companionship exemption would result in reduced availability of care to seniors and the disabled, and increase the costs of service delivery with no corresponding increase from third party payers, such as Medicaid.  Federal and state programs are already in jeopardy, and in no position to increase their payment rates to meet the added costs of overtime compensation.

When the proposed regulations are formally published in the Federal Register, there will be a 60-day period to submit comments. According to health care law attorney Elizabeth E. Hogue of Burtonsville, Maryland, in the past input has been effective making an impact on proposed Labor Department regulations addressing such exemptions.

It is imperative for seniors, their families, agencies, and anyone else concerned about the impact of these burdensome and costly regulations to speak out and let the federal government know the damaging effect these changes will have on them.

To preserve your right to affordable, reliable home care services, it is critically important that you contact the Labor Department and tell officials you oppose this change.

To make an official comment, you can do so online through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Comments must be received on or before February 27, 2012. In order to leave a comment, please click on this link. When you reach the page, click on the “Submit a Comment” button and enter your comment.

Please note that you will be required to give your contact information in order to comment and that it may be publicly posted.

You may also mail a letter to:

Mary Ziegler
Director, Division of Regulations, Legislation, and Interpretation
Wage and Hour Division
U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-3502
200 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20210

All submissions must include the agency name and Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1235-AA05.

Take a few minutes and contact your representatives in Washington. Let them know how these changes will negatively impact your family and your community. It could make all the difference.

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com”when quoting from or linking to this story.
Copyright © 2012 by At Your Home Familycare

Ten foods sure to wreck your New Year’s resolution

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

Photo: Bacon Doughnut

Have you set a New Year’s resolution yet? If statistics hold true, many of you have resolved to live more healthfully including eating right, exercising more and losing weight. Congratulations!

Virtually all of us, resolved or not, can benefit from efforts to improve our health, but we are in serious denial. In a survey by the healthcare company Cigna HealthCare, more than half of all Americans say they are in good or excellent health. The other half? They say they only need to lose 10 pounds on average to be healthy.

Yet the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) says two-thirds of all Americans are overweight or clinically obese, which is more than 20 percent overweight or having a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or more.

Americans eat too many calories and the calories we eat often have little nutritional value. We are eating ourselves to death and it is costing this nation an enormous amount of money treating diseases of obesity: diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.

It does not take a complete overhaul of your diet to make changes with significant impact. Eating less of the foods loaded up with calories and nutritionally empty which adding foods packed with benefits without so much fat, cholesterol and sodium can help you lose weight, add muscle, keep a sharp mind, and boost your energy.

I have put together a list of ten foods commonly eaten by many Americans that have little or no nutritional value, as determined by a variety of nutrition experts. These are the foods on most lists. Eating less of these offenders will give your healthy resolution a good start.

The Ten Worst Foods

Chips – This is not a lot different than eating a stick of butter and shaking salt all over it. Who would do that? If you eat just three ounces of chips a week, in one year you’ll have consumed 23,400 calories and gain seven pounds. But most people do not stop at three ounces.

Fettucine alfredo is called a heart attack on a plate for a reason. Add bacon and you are doing serious diet damage.

Bacon – This is almost entirely animal fat, high in salt and high in calories. Think of yourself chewing on a big nasty piece of gristle. Your digestive system has to work just as hard to try and pass it out of your system. Appealing?

Doughnuts – White flour with white sugar deep-fried in shortening. Imagine one plugging up your heart and stopping it from beating. Two doughnuts with your coffee are your entire fat intake for a day.

Fettucine Alfredo – There is a reason this dish has been called “heart attack on a plate.” Butter, cream and cheese over pasta, with even more fat than a doughnut. A portion the size of your fist, just three ounces, has double your fat intake suggested per day.

Processed Meats – Full of fat, salt, and nitrates which are linked to cancer, this includes sausages, hot dogs, and processed luncheon meats. Not highest in calories, but virtually every calorie in these meats damages you.

Chicken can be a healthy, protein rich choice... but not prepared this way. Southern Living photo.

Fried Chicken – A single fried chicken breast has 400 calories and 22 grams of fat, much of it in the batter that soaks up all the oil, plus the skin. Cut the fat and calories in half with a skinless chicken breast, flame grilled or barbecues with a hot spice rub or chili and lime juice.  

 French Fries – A large order of fast-food fries typically has 570 calories, half from fat, and they are loaded with salt. Add a fatty burger and you have solved the mystery why your pants are tight.

Soft White Bread – Why is this here? Bread doesn’t have that many calories or much fat, right? The problem is that white bread is almost like eating a candy bar because it’s pure simple carbohydrates. It will spike your blood sugar, then cause it to crash, and you will feel hungry. That’s when you get the French fries at the drive-through window.

Don't drink your calories. Sugary sodas can pack on hundreds of calories to your diet each day.

Soda Pop – When you drink a soda, you are drinking sugar. Drinking your calories is one of the fastest ways to gain weight.

Non-Dairy Toppings – These products are made of corn syrup and vegetable oil. Imagine pouring oil and corn syrup on your pie. A tablespoon is 32 calories and you are likely to use ten or more tablespoons.

Ice cream – We know this is a favorite treat for so many people, but it needs to be a rare indulgence. One serving of a gourmet type of ice cream has your whole fat intake for the day, wrapped in plenty of sugar… and few people eat just a single serving, which is one-half cup. You may eat two, three, even four. You are likely to eat it as dessert after dinner, right before bedtime, the worst time possible.

It is unrealistic to expect anyone to give up all ten of these foods at once. Consider eliminating half of them, and cutting back significantly on the other half of the list. Eat them as treats, not as regular features of your diet.

In a future LifeCycles column, I will provide a list of the Ten Best foods for resolution success.

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.

Resolve to make little changes that add up to a lot with your New Year’s resolution

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

In the week between Christmas Day and New Year’s Day, we start getting serious about New Year’s resolutions. Nearly half of all Americans will make a New Year’s resolution.

Resolutions have a long tradition. Ancient Romans including Julias Caesar offered resolutions of good conduct to the God Janus, the god of beginnings and doorways whose two faces look both backwards and forwards. The month of January is named after him. Ever since these times, people have used the beginning of a new year and the prospect of a clean slate to seize a new opportunity.

The most popular resolutions today involve our personal health: quitting smoking, losing weight, and exercising more. Improving family relationships or spending more time with family is another popular category. Saving money, making more money, and other financial goals rounds off the top three most popular categories.

Do we set ourselves up for failure when we make resolutions? How many of us are still going to the gym or eating healthfully by Valentine’s Day? Surprisingly, more than you might believe.

Dr. John Norcross, a Distinguished University Fellow and Professor of Psychology at the University of Scranton (PA), was curious how many people were successful in sticking to their resolutions. He said he was tired of people saying that resolutions didn’t work and no one should bother to try them. He tracked people who made resolutions and people who had the same types of goals but who didn’t make resolutions.

The good news is that the glass is half full. Forty-six percent of the people who made resolutions were still successful after six months. Only four percent of those who hadn’t stated a resolution were successful after six months. So while there are people who fail, many others succeed. You can be one of them.

So it’s worth taking your resolution seriously and giving yourself the best possible chance of success. What should you do to become part of the 46 percent? Experts suggest several tips:

  • Make your goals realistic and attainable. Losing 50 pounds is admirable, but it may make more sense to strive for 20 pounds. Going to the gym every single day sounds great, but shooting for three days a week is something you have a better chance of sticking with.
  • Set both short-term and long-term goals. Aim for losing five pounds in the first month toward your 20-pound weight loss. Achieving small near-term goals are shown to boost confidence and help people stick with their program. People also work harder when deadlines loom.
  • Identify specific steps in your plan to achieve your goal. Using the weight-loss example, resolve to change specific habits, such as giving up sugary sodas in favor of sparkling water and unsweetened iced tea. Substitute crispbreads for chips. Plan to walk three days a week.
  • State your intentions publicly, and enlist support. You are much more likely to stick to your plan to go to the gym if you plan to exercise with a friend, or commit to a trainer. Even buying a pedometer to count your steps daily can help.
  • Plan what you will do if you slip. Setbacks are inevitable, but they don’t need to derail your efforts. When you have one, identify the reasons and the triggers, and consider what you can do to avoid it happening again. Did you engage in mindless eating watching football on TV at a friend’s house? Suggest other activities, or contribute healthier food choices.
  • Celebrate your successes, and surround yourself with others who are on the road to success.

If you would like to start on your resolution here and now, go for it by stating your intentions in the comments section. What do you resolve to achieve in 2012?

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com” when quoting from or linking to this story.  
Copyright © 2011 by At Your Home Familycare

The most American of all Christmas carols

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

As a LifeCycles Christmas tradition, we share the story of one of America’s most loved Christmas carols. The spirit of our nation lies deep within this song.

When Henry Wadsworth Longfellow composed this poem, which became the lyrics of a much-loved Christmas carol, America was still months away from General Robert E. Lee’s surrender to General Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865.

Longfellow had long despaired over the Civil War, as it reflected his own darkest personal despair. His beloved wife Fanny had died two years earlier. His oldest son Charles, a Lieutenant in the Army of the Potomoc, had been seriously wounded in the war.

Thankfully, Charles survived. It was the start of the hope for a future without war for Longfellow. He awoke on Christmas Day 1863, and felt the inspiration to write a poem looking forward toward better days. Longfellow captured the nation’s awakening as well, as the poem ends with a confident hope of triumphant peace.

Christmas Bells

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

(Written on Christmas Day 1863)

I heard the bells on Christmas Day

Their old, familiar carols play,

And wild and sweet

The words repeat

Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

And thought how, as the day had come,

The belfries of all Christendom

Had rolled along

The unbroken song

Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

Till ringing, singing on its way,

The world revolved from night to day,

A voice, a chime,

A chant sublime

Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

Then from each black, accursed mouth

The cannon thundered in the South,

And with the sound

The carols drowned

Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

It was as if an earthquake rent

The hearth-stones of a continent,

And made forlorn

The households born

Of peace on earth, good-will to men!

“There is no peace on earth,” I said;

“For hate is strong,

And mocks the song

Of peace on earth, good-will to men!”

Then pealed the bells more loud and deep:

“God is not dead, nor doth He sleep;

The Wrong shall fail,

The Right prevail,

With peace on earth, good-will to men.”

May you hear the joy and glory of the bells on Christmas Day and keep the spirit of Christmas in your heart each and every day.

Video: Actor Ed Hermann and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir perform “I Heard the Bells On Christmas Day”

YouTube Preview Image

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com”when quoting from or linking to this story.
Copyright © 2011 by At Your Home Familycare

Christmas childhood memories of family, favorite gifts, and helicopters

Weekly column in the Washington Times Communities by Laurie Edwards-Tate

Photo: Courtesy Laurie Edwards-Tate

Christmas was always a wonderful experience growing up in San Diego, California.

The concept of a white Christmas is not entirely lost on those who live in warm climates. But in sunny San Diego, the experience of dashing through the snow is completely foreign. Even though December is the coolest month of the year in San Diego, the average is still in the high 60s. Temperatures of 75 degrees or more are not uncommon during Christmas week. The all time record: 88 degrees! Average rainfall is just one and a half inches for the whole month. Local attractions do their best, bringing out the snow machines and create artificial snow to delight California children.

But, how did Santa Claus ever deliver so many presents when it never snowed in San Diego, California?  Most homes did not have fireplaces, though they are much in vogue today in Southern California, though merely as decoration.

At five years old, we spent Christmas staying with my aunt and her family in their splendid San Diego home that year.  On Christmas Eve, my dad and I were peering outside a large, picture window, looking of course for Santa Claus, his reindeer, and the promise of all his presents.  Suddenly fear gripped me as reality hit a child’s mind.

“Daddy, how can Santa deliver all our presents with his reindeer, if there is no snow!”  Never mind that presents arriving had never been a problem on any past Christmas, and most five year olds know it might be wrong to ask such a pointed question.

Dad took his time answering. He gave it so much thought, it occurred to me that maybe my question had some merit after all!

Cherished memories of the family Christmas tree live in black and white for many of us. Courtesy Laurie Edwards-Tate.

“Honey, out here Santa arrives by helicopter!”  It made sense although I felt slightly uneasy with this response. Nevertheless my concerns were eased. There was no reason to be disappointed with Santa Claus the very next morning!

Next year at the far more mature age of six, I decided to investigate what I had learned the previous Christmas and see if I could prove what my Dad had told me for myself. On Christmas Eve, I let my parents think I had gone to bed. Instead, upon hearing them retire for the evening, I got up and snuck out of my bedroom. I hid behind a large, overstuffed chair in the living room.  I was awaiting the arrival of Santa Claus via helicopter, still feeling a little envious of all the children in other parts of the world who might be fortunate enough to spy Santa Claus with his reindeer.

The hot chocolate and cookies were waiting on the dining room table. I knew he hadn’t already come yet, and settled down to wait.

It was for naught. My parents caught me spying, and I was promptly sent to bed.  The next day on Christmas morning, I was very grateful for Santa Claus and forgot all about his reindeer.

Do our favorite gifts foretell the future or create the future? Either way, working in healthcare was always my destiny. I cherished my play doctor kit replete with bag, plastic stethoscope, candy pills, and a variety of patient-care tools such as bandages and such. What great fun dispensing “medications,” taking pulses, and administering first aid to patient members of my family. My doctor bag was the best. I could hardly wait for the arrival of our Christmas guests to get underway so I could practice on them too.

But no matter how many sets of play kitchen accessories, petite plastic fry pans, small oven and refrigerator, and other cookware, none would have been enough to create a Martha Stewart in the making.

Thank you for my book, Santa! Courtesy Laurie Edwards-Tate

Looking back as an adult, although I still have great fondness for my doctor bag, the greatest gift was being blessed to have large family gatherings, with great grandparents, grandparents, both my parents, aunts, uncles, and cousins on hand. It was so easy to assume everyone else’s experience was the same.  It was not possible to fathom life without them, nor the reality that slowly but surely life would change, which makes these memories of past Christmases even more precious.

Now I know all too well working with older adults that not everyone is lucky enough to be surrounded by loving family whether of blood or choice. The holidays can be a lonely time. It is incumbent upon each of us to do what we can to change this through paying forward the gift of time and fellowship with others that our families have lovingly given to us.

Until next time, enjoy the ride in good health!

LifeCycles is intended to provide inspiration and information only. If you are considering any health, dietary, exercise or lifestyle changes based on the information provided here, please seek advice from a qualified professional.
Laurie Edwards-Tate, MS, is President and CEO of At Your Home Familycare in San Diego, California. In addition to her positions as entrepreneur, health care executive, educator, radio segment contributor and media guest, Edwards-Tate is also a wife, daughter, and dog lover. Read more  LifeCycles in the Communities at The Washington Times. Follow At Your Home Familycare on Facebook and on Twitter @AYHFamilycare.
Please credit “Laurie Edwards-Tate for Communities at WashingtonTimes.com” when quoting from or linking to this story.  
Copyright © 2011 by At Your Home Familycare